Products of Conception References

  1. Lomax, B., et al., Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet, 2000. 66(5): p. 1516-21.
  2. Foyouzi, N., M.I. Cedars, and H.G. Huddleston, Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception in the patient with a second pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril, 2012. 98(1): p. 151-5.
  3. Warburton, D., Cytogenetics of reproductive wastage: from conception to birth. , in Medical Cytogenetics, H.F.L.e. Mark, Editor. 2000, Marcel Dekker: New York. p. 213–246.
  4. Boue, J., A. Boue, and P. Lazar, Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. 1975. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol, 2013. 97(7): p. 471-86.
  5. Hassold, T., et al., A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet, 1980. 44(Pt 2): p. 151-78.
  6. Kajii, T., et al., Anatomic and chromosomal anomalies in 639 spontaneous abortuses. Hum Genet, 1980. 55(1): p. 87-98.
  7. Kalousek, D.K., et al., Early spontaneous abortion: morphologic and karyotypic findings in 3,912 cases. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, 1993. 29(1): p. 53-61.
  8. Fritz, B., et al., Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet, 2001. 9(7): p. 539-47.
  9. Korteweg, F.J., et al., Cytogenetic analysis after evaluation of 750 fetal deaths: proposal for diagnostic workup. Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 111(4): p. 865-74.
  10. Rodgers, C.S., et al., Solid tissue culture for cytogenetic analysis: a collaborative survey for the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists. J Clin Pathol, 1996. 49(8): p. 638-41.
  11. Morales, C., et al., Cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions using semi-direct analysis of chorionic villi samples detects the broadest spectrum of chromosome abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A, 2008. 146a(1): p. 66-70.
  12. Jobanputra, V., et al., Using FISH to increase the yield and accuracy of karyotypes from spontaneous abortion specimens. Prenat Diagn, 2011. 31(8): p. 755-9.
  13. Nikitina, T.V., et al., A mathematical model for evaluation of maternal cell contamination in cultured cells from spontaneous abortions: significance for cytogenetic analysis of prenatal selection factors. Fertil Steril, 2005. 83(4): p. 964-72.
  14. Bell, K.A., et al., Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril, 1999. 71(2): p. 334-41.
  15. Griffin, D.K., et al., Cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions: comparison of techniques and assessment of the incidence of confined placental mosaicism. Am J Med Genet, 1997. 72(3): p. 297-301.
  16. Jarrett, K.L., et al., Microsatellite analysis reveals a high incidence of maternal cell contamination in 46,XX products of conception consisting of villi or a combination of villi and membranous material. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001. 185(1): p. 198-203.
  17. Hu, Y., et al., Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006. 92(1): p. 52-7.
  18. Benkhalifa, M., et al., Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro. Prenat Diagn, 2005. 25(10): p. 894-900.
  19. Reddy, U.M., et al., Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth. N Engl J Med, 2012. 367(23): p. 2185-93.
  20. Morgen, E.K., G. Maire, and E. Kolomietz, A clinical algorithm for efficient, high-resolution cytogenomic analysis of uncultured perinatal tissue samples. Eur J Med Genet, 2012. 55(8-9): p. 446-54.
  21. Azmanov, D.N., et al., Profile of chromosomal aberrations in different gestational age spontaneous abortions detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2007. 131(2): p. 127-31.
  22. Schaeffer, A.J., et al., Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet, 2004. 74(6): p. 1168-74.
  23. Lebedev, I.N., et al., Features of chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion cell culture failures detected by interphase FISH analysis. Eur J Hum Genet, 2004. 12(7): p. 513-20.
  24. Viaggi, C.D., et al., First-trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH. J Appl Genet, 2013. 54(3): p. 353-9.
  25. Warren, J.E., et al., Array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic evaluation of fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 114(5): p. 1093-102.
  26. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol, 2009. 113(3): p. 748-61.
  27. American College of, O. and G. Gynecologists Committee on, Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol, 2013. 122(6): p. 1374-7.